Amid ongoing layoffs, Google staff within the US and Canada are pushing again, launching a petition addressed to CEO Sundar Pichai, demanding job safety. Titled “Job Security,” the petition displays rising considerations in regards to the firm’s future workforce insurance policies.
Google staff within the US and Canada worry extra layoffs.(REUTERS)
In keeping with CNBC, extra 1,250 staff have already signed it, urging management to offer readability and stability.
“We, the undersigned Google workers from offices across the US and Canada, are concerned about instability at Google that impacts our ability to do high quality, impactful work,” the petition states.
Within the petition, the staff have argued that Google is financially secure, so the layoffs do not make sense. In keeping with them, the layoffs appear pointless and unfair.
“Ongoing rounds of layoffs make us really feel insecure about our jobs. The corporate is clearly in a powerful monetary place, making the lack of so many precious colleagues with out clarification harm much more,” it learn.
The petition comes amid Google’s cost-cutting stance because the tech large shifts its focus to the continued AI wave. The corporate’s new chief monetary officer (CFO), Anat Ashkenazi, has referred to as cost-cutting a serious precedence, particularly as the corporate invests extra in AI infrastructure in 2025. She talked about that there are nonetheless extra methods to scale back bills, which made staff nervous about additional layoffs. Google hasn’t supplied any particular particulars in regards to the cost-cutting measures it intends to undertake.
The Google staff’ calls for
By the petition, the staff have requested Google CEO Sundar Pichai to supply voluntary buyouts earlier than laying individuals off, assure severance pay for laid-off staff, and never use efficiency critiques as an excuse to fireplace staff.
The workers imagine that the corporate is perhaps giving low-performance scores simply to make use of them as a layoff excuse. Nevertheless, Google denied these allegations and stated efficiency critiques are honest and primarily based on particular person roles and expectations.