Sporting small garments and dancing in a bar will not be a criminal offense except it causes public annoyance, a Delhi court docket has dominated whereas acquitting seven girls accused of obscenity.
The case is said to an incident in March final 12 months at a bar in Delhi’s Paharganj. (Consultant file photograph)
The judgment, delivered on February 4 by further chief judicial Justice of the Peace Neetu Sharma of Tis Hazari Courtroom, additionally cleared the supervisor of the bar of prices associated to working and not using a license and failing to keep up correct CCTV surveillance.
The case is said to an incident in March final 12 months at a bar in Delhi’s Paharganj.
In accordance with the prosecution, seven girls have been allegedly dancing in an obscene method, disturbing the general public, resulting in a case below Part 294 of the Indian Penal Code (obscene acts and songs in public locations).
Exonerating the ladies, the court docket dominated that neither sporting revealing garments nor dancing to songs constitutes a criminal offense.
“Now, neither wearing small clothes is a crime nor dancing to songs can be punished, irrespective of whether such dance is done in public. It is only when the dance becomes annoying to others that the dancer can be punished,” it held.
Additionally Learn: Shorter path to Chandigarh airport to be full by December 2025: Punjab to HC
It additional emphasised that an offence is just established if the efficiency causes annoyance to the general public.
Through the trial, two prosecution witnesses admitted that that they had visited the bar for leisure and have been unaware of any alleged obscenity. The court docket famous that within the absence of public complaints, it appeared that the police had fabricated the case to focus on the accused girls and the bar supervisor.
The court docket additionally identified that the complainant, sub-inspector Dharmendra of Delhi Police, failed to supply an obligation roster or a Each day Diary (DD) entry to show he was patrolling the world on the time of the incident.
Concerning allegations in opposition to the bar supervisor, the court docket held that the prosecution failed to provide any proof exhibiting violations of police or authorities pointers within the bar’s operation.
With no substantial proof, the court docket acquitted all accused, underlining that non-public decisions of apparel and dance don’t represent a authorized offence except they disrupt public order.