The Nationwide Investigation Company (NIA) has opposed earlier than the Delhi excessive courtroom, jailed Jammu & Kashmir MP Rashid Engineer’s petition to be launched on custody parole to attend the continuing Parliament funds session, accusing him of abusing the courtroom’s course of by indulging in discussion board buying.
The second part of the Parliament Funds session which started March 10, will conclude on April 4. (PTI file picture)
The second part of the Parliament Funds session which started March 10, will conclude on April 4.
In its affidavit filed on Monday, the probe company has asserted that the parliamentarian has already utilized for normal bail earlier than the town courtroom, and he thus can not search identical reduction by submitting a number of proceedings earlier than completely different courts.
“At the outset, it is submitted that the appellant is indulging in forum shopping which is an abuse of the process of the court. It is submitted that the petitioner has already applied for regular bail and the same is kept for order on March 19 by the NIA special court. The present petition is seeking to achieve the same and the petitioner cannot be permitted to file multiple proceedings seeking the same relief,” the affidavit which might be thought of by a bench of justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Anup Jairam Bhambhani on Tuesday, said.
The parliamentarian had approached the Delhi excessive courtroom towards the town courtroom’s March 10 order denying him custody parole.
Although the matter was listed earlier than a bench of justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Anup Jairam Bhambhani on Tuesday, the identical received adjourned for March 25 on the request of counsel for Rashid in addition to NIA.
Additionally Learn: HC seeks NIA response to Engineer Rashid’s plea to attend Parliament
In his petition earlier than the excessive courtroom, the parliamentarian had asserted that the town courtroom’s order was “erroneous” and his presence within the session was necessary to successfully signify and deal with the considerations of the folks of his constituency within the stated Lok Sabha session. It went on so as to add that the President had issued him summons to attend the session.
The excessive courtroom final month had granted him two days custody parole to attend the primary leg of the funds session. To make certain, on February 10, a bench of justice Vikas Mahajan whereas granting two days custody parole to Rashid had stated, considered non availability of the discussion board to listen to the parliamentarian’s utility for bail, asserting that the identical had rendered him remediless.
On Wednesday, the Delhi excessive courtroom had sought NIA’s response until March 17.
In its 17-page affidavit, the probe company asserted that Rashid doesn’t have enforceable proper to attend the Parliament session, and the NIA particular courtroom has earlier dismissed his petitions looking for the same reduction in July 2024 and March 2025.
Terming the issuance of summons by the President to Rashid as a “routine matter”, the probe company additional argued that the identical weren’t “exclusively sent to him”, and despatched to all of the parliamentarians and that he was attempting to make use of the explanation of attending the session to get away from the rigours of imprisonment.